Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] Confusingorg.apache.batik versions

Hi,

I removed the unused dependencies [1].
So we have only one remaining dependency in infra.gmfdiag.common

Benoit,
1: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/106335/

-----Message d'origine-----
De : mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de MAGGI Benoit
Envoyé : vendredi 6 octobre 2017 11:37
À : Papyrus Project list <mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] [mdt-papyrus.dev] TR: [cross-project-issues-dev] Confusingorg.apache.batik versions

Hi,

For information there is an ongoing task to force batik 1.9 for GMF Runtime in Photon.

So far in Papyrus,
 - batik is referenced in infra.gmfdiag.common, uml.diagram.common, uml.diagram.clazz and uml.diagram.sequence. 
 - version is bundle-version="[1.6.0,1.7.0)",
 
Questions:
 - Can we remove batik from uml.diagram.common, uml.diagram.clazz and uml.diagram.sequence ? => Seems unused dependencies
- Is there any know issue that will prevent the use of 1.9 version? 

Regards,
Benoit

-----Message d'origine-----
De : cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Pierre-Charles David Envoyé : vendredi 6 octobre 2017 09:41 À : cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Confusing org.apache.batik versions

Hi,

Quick followup on this issue: I plan to contribute all the Batik 1.9 JARs currently missing and that are required by GMF Runtime into Orbit for Photon. I'll do what I can, but this may not be done by M3. Roland has agreed to wait until M4 if needed before removing the older versions from Orbit [1].

Projects that are currently known to be affected by this are:
* GMF Runtime (see #517093)
* Sirius (see #525362)
* GMF Tooling (but they've dropped from the train, and I don't know if they plan to make new releases)
* Papyrus (according to a quick grep on their MANIFEST.MF)

There may be others, either via GMF Runtime or directly. Please check.

Affected projects should follow bug #522740 or bug #517093, and if you've got any experience with packaging and contributing JARs into Orbit (I don't), any help would be appreciated.

Regards,
Pierre-Charles David (Obeo)

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=522740#c8

-- 

*Pierre-Charles David*
+33 2 51 13 52 18

<http://www.obeo.fr/>

7 Boulevard Ampère - Carquefou - France
*obeo.fr* <http://www.obeo.fr/> | *twitter* <https://twitter.com/obeo_corp> | *linkedin* <https://www.linkedin.com/company/obeo>

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
mdt-papyrus.dev mailing list
mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-papyrus.dev

Back to the top