Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] [PROVENANCE INTERNET] RE : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Papyrus plan for managing GMFT dropout of therelease train

Benoit,

 

Your proposition seems to match our requirements.

So +1.

 

Could you add in the patch:

·         A description field in the pom.xml

·         Check if you need to add an update in the oomph section?

·         Why starting at version 3.0.0 ?

·         There a re several missing EPL license in the header of files

 

Have a good day

 

Francois

 

De : mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de GERARD Sebastien
Envoyé : lundi 23 janvier 2017 18:25
À : Papyrus Project list <mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] [mdt-papyrus.dev] RE : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Papyrus plan for managing GMFT dropout of therelease train

 

+1

 

 

 

Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy.

 

 

-------- Message d'origine --------

De : MAGGI Benoit <Benoit.MAGGI@xxxxxx>

Date : 23/01/2017 18:02 (GMT+01:00)

À : Papyrus Project list <mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Objet : [PROVENANCE  INTERNET] [mdt-papyrus.dev] Papyrus plan for managing GMFT dropout of therelease train

 

Hi,

 

As everyone know GMFT Project announced that it will stop contributing to the release train.

A short analysis showed that the part of Papyrus that is currently contributed to the release train has a strong dependency to org.eclipse.gmf.tooling.runtime

 

We tried to include the plugin in the Project GMF-Runtime/Notation (See [1])

but Papyrus is the only one with dependency to GMFT

so it doesn’t really make sense to integrate the plugin in GMF-Runtime/Notation for only one project.

 

The chosen option is to fork the plugin an reintegrate it in Papyrus to stay in the train.

The new namespace will be org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.gmfdiag.tooling.runtime

The first patch may be found here [2]

 

These are sad news but this is the best plan we have.

 

If anyone has an objection/suggestion/improvement… ?

It’s the last call before merging the new plugin and regenerating all the diagrams.

 

Regards,

Benoit

1: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=510616

2: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/89368/

 


Back to the top