Hi all,
We’re almost done with the regressions in Papyrus Mars, and the final build is in a few days (Wednesday), so let’s finish this :)
There are two regressions (Most likely related) in the Activity Diagram, when dropping some nodes from a Partition/Interruptible Region to the Activity. Graphically, everything’s OK, but semantically the nodes are still considered to be
inside the Region/Partition.
Is anyone looking at this ATM? Is there already a pending Gerrit contribution? I know there were work in progress related to partitions and drag/drop but I’m not sure where we are exactly on this topic. I’ve opened Bug 469366 to track the
issue
BTW, the assertions are reversed, so you should read “Expected 0 but was 1”, instead of “Expected 1 but was 0”. I’ve just fixed the assertion, so the test should be more accurate after the next build, but the issue is still there.
https://hudson.eclipse.org/papyrus/job/Papyrus-Master-Tests/lastBuild/testReport/junit/org.eclipse.papyrus.uml.diagram.activity.tests.canonical/TestActivityGroup/testFromActivityPartitionToActivity/
https://hudson.eclipse.org/papyrus/job/Papyrus-Master-Tests/lastBuild/testReport/junit/org.eclipse.papyrus.uml.diagram.activity.tests.canonical/TestActivityGroup/testFromInterruptibleActivityRegionToActivity/
469366: [Activity Diagram] Drop from a Partition/Interruptible Region doesn't change the semantic model (#inPartition)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=469366
Regards,
Camille