Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] Use of org.eclipse.jdt.annotation in Papyrus

[Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Camille

You're not reading the Bugzillas carefully enough.

You only have 1.1 "Resolved", but you have 2.0 "Installed". The PDE bug 
is that it allows Installed but not Resolved plugins to be used.

I have been using the target Platform workaround for a few days without 
trouble. The only downside is that every time you install/uninstall you 
need to update the no-jdt-annotation-2.0 target platform.

Note that Eclipse OCL makes very heavy use of @NonNull/@Nullable.

    Regards

        Ed Willink


On 12/05/2014 12:07, LETAVERNIER Camille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've never used these annotations in Papyrus, and never made an actual choice on whether they should be used or not. I don't know why they've been used in this specific plug-in. If the workaround suggested by Ed works, then we can go for it. Otherwise, we can simply remove these annotations.
>
> BTW, I only have org.eclipse.jdt.annotation 1.1 installed in my platform, and still have these compile errors.
>
> Camille
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Ed Willink
> Envoyé : vendredi 9 mai 2014 21:23
> À : Papyrus Project list
> Objet : Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] Use of org.eclipse.jdt.annotation in Papyrus
>
> Hi Christian
>
> See
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=434307
>
> and
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=434499
>
> The workaround is to define a Target Platform that excludes jdt.annotation 2.0.0
>
> Please add a me-too to this problem.
>
> 	Regards
>
> 		Ed Willink
>
> On 09/05/2014 19:41, Christian W. Damus wrote:
> > Hi, Team,
> >
> > I updated to Luna M7 today, and am now bitten by the problem in JDT's Java 8 support [1] that produces invalid compilation errors on usage of the @Nullable and @NonNull annotations from the org.eclipse.jdt.annotation package in projects configured for compliance level less than 1.8.
> >
> > We have instances of these annotations in the org.eclipse.papyrus.uml.search.ui project.
> >
> > I thought I had understood that Papyrus doesn't use these annotations.  Has that policy changed?  Or was it not a policy, and I was mistaken?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=426582
> > _______________________________________________
> > mdt-papyrus.dev mailing list
> > mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-papyrus.dev
> >
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2014.0.4577 / Virus Database: 3931/7466 - Release Date: 05/09/14
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-papyrus.dev mailing list
> mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-papyrus.dev
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-papyrus.dev mailing list
> mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-papyrus.dev
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4577 / Virus Database: 3931/7478 - Release Date: 05/11/14