[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Hi Ed,
Unless good APIs documentation is a strong requirement, I don't think
that extra efforts can convince somebody.
I'll take into consideration for my new code, in which I want to have
accurate documentation. Then I could do some proper judge.
Having RC2 issues reporting users means that somebody else is strongly
interested in having a good quality improved Kepler OCL release ;).
Cheers,
Adolfo.
On 03/06/2013 19:39, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
I went to the EclipseCon 2012 presentation and failed to see how Intent
was actually useful. I leave it to you to convince me.
Fortunately both RC2 regressions are the same one. Two RC2 users! The
fix is just an NPE guard. Testing now.
Regards
Ed
On 03/06/2013 19:32, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Hi Ed,
Eclipse OCL Core (+1) RC3 done.
Integration build with the whole Eclipse Core + Tools also done for
the aggregator build.
Concerning documentation, I had in my TO DO list giving a look to the
Intent project [1]. After a very, very quick look, it sounds cool
although it also seems to require much effort to keep everything in
sync (quite challenging for a big project like OCL).
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/intent/
Cheers,
Adolfo.
On 03/06/2013 18:14, Adolfo Sanchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
Ok,
So I'll follow the normal (+1, +3 timing) procedures.
Cheers,
Adolfo.
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6379 - Release Date: 06/03/13
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
