| Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Indigo SR0 editors don't run on SR2 |
Hi Ed, please be aware of the fact that we contribute Xtext 2.0.1 to Indigo SR2. The distro from download location that you mentioned in the bug bundles a newer version of Xtext. However, we'll try to avoid these problems for future releases. Meanwhile you may want to set an upper bound for Xtext in your SR2 contribution? Best regards, Sebastian On 15.02.2012, at 08:17, Ed Willink wrote: > Hi > > Xtext 2.2.1 for (SR2) appears to have changed 'internal' APIs and so attempting to run OCLinEcore 3.1.1 with Xtext 2.2.1 gives editor instantiation failures.https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=371574. > > While this is clearly an Xtext problem, it isn't going to be fixed for SR2 or SR2a, we can just hope that itemis learn how many of their 'internal' APIs are actually external and avoid the problem in the future. > > Anyway it is our user's problem, so I think we need to create a 3.1.2X release in which we regenerate editors and raise the lower bound on Xtext to 2.2.1 to force compatibility. This is of course not allowed in an SR, so it isn't an SR as such. Is an X suffix enough, or do we want a longer more distinct name? Adolfo: is there any spelling that is particularly easy for releng? > > Regards > > Ed > _______________________________________________ > mdt-ocl.dev mailing list > mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail