[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [mdt-ocl.dev] Interesting EMF enhancement and OCL Plan.
|
Hi All,
I am planning to create the draft plan in the
expected format on Monday/Tuesday based on the discussed
proposals.
Cheers,
- Alex.
Thanks, Ed. I've updated that page to add two additional enhancements
(for a derived feature setting delegate and an operation invocation delegate).
Note that the time to prepare a plan for OCL 3.0 is running short; it must
be complete, and in the expected format, by the end of September. Please let me
know how I can help in this regard.
Cheers,
Kenn
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Ed Willink
<ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi
I thought that Alex as lead
was producing a first cut plan, but obviously his time has been restricted
recently.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT/OCL_3.0.0_API_Changes, which
Adolfo started and I update regularly, is well on the
way to being a plan.
Perhaps it should just be evolved a bit.
I've added an extra column for
the initials of whoever has undertaken to implement the change.
I've
added an extra table for outright enhancements and put 255786 there, perhaps
the description needs improving.
I've added another extra table for
unendorsed enhancements where anyone is welcome to identify contributions that
they are offering via Bugzilla.
Ed
Kenn Hussey wrote:
Adolfo,
Cheers,
Kenn
2009/9/17 Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera
<adolfosbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Team,
There is an
interesting bug which is being dealt by Kenn about a way to add constrains
annotated to ecore's models:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255786Unfortunately,
at this moment I don't have time to revise it (not to much avaiable time
and I also have to revise some ed's pending patches). However, I think
that it's a valuable bug to take into account. Some other required
enhancements (
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=270974)
can be resolved in a better way if there is an EMF's standar solution to
include constraints in a metamodel. So if someone else have some available
time, I would recommend having a look to that bug.
On the other
hand, I must ping again regarding the needed discussion about MDT-OCL
plan. I haven't received any response in my last try.... Let me put some
items on the table if they may help:
- Project reorganization.
-
LPG v2 migration (grammars, parsing infrastructure, ...)
- UI addons:
EMF generated edit and editor, OCL text editor, OCL interpreter,
capabilities...
- OCL 2.1 specification adoption.
It seems a lot
a work, some is completed, some in progress, some should be
rationalized to be able to plan it.... Comments are
welcomed.
Cheers,
Adolfo.
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev
mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev
mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev