Yes, it is 0.8 J
Ok. We will do the tag the version
tomorrow, test and publish a new downloadable. If everything goes ok, we will
create the branch and go on with the 1.0 development.
From:
mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Johnson
Sent: Montag, 18. Januar 2010
16:27
To: Memory
Analyzer Dev list
Subject: Re: [mat-dev] RE:
Branching MAT 8.0 in SVN
Shouldn't the branch version be 0.8 not 8.0 ?
I
don't have any important pending fixes, so branching on Tuesday 19 January 2010
is fine.
Andrew
Johnson
From:
|
"Tsvetkov, Krum"
<krum.tsvetkov@xxxxxxx>
|
To:
|
Memory Analyzer Dev list
<mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
|
14/01/2010 14:27
|
Subject:
|
[mat-dev] RE: Branching MAT 8.0 in SVN
|
Sent by:
|
mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
We intend to create the tag (or branch) for the
“old” 8.0 release next weak on Tuesday. We would put then this version on the
update site as the latest 8.0 build.
Then we will continue in trunk the development of what would
be the 1.0 release, meaning there will be some bigger changes introduced.
Are there any objections to do the split on Tuesday (19 Jan)
– may be some unfinished fixes expected in 0.8?
From:
mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mat-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tsvetkov, Krum
Sent: Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 16:03
To: Memory Analyzer Dev list
Subject: [LIKELY JUNK][mat-dev] Branching MAT 8.0 in SVN
Hi,
We
expect that in the 1.0 release (we are targeting beginning of April) we will
add some APIs. It is also a good point in time to reconsider our current APIs
and adjust some of them if necessary.
Therefore
I was thinking it will be good if we create a branch for our current version –
8.0. This is the one included in Galileo and slightly improved afterwards. We
could use then the 8.0 as a more stable release, and fix there only some
important bugs if necessary.
We can
then increase the version numbers in trunk to something like 0.9 and make there
the new development and necessary API changes.
So my
question is – do you have any current
activities / bugfixes for 8.0 which need to be finished before splitting the
code? What will be a good time for the split?
BTW, I
have created a bugzilla entry to track the API changes for 1.0: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=299371
Regards,
Krum Tsvetkov
Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx
Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige
vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich
erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung
oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie
uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank.
This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise
confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are
hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly
prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal.
Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
mat-dev mailing list
mat-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mat-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England
and Wales
with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41,
North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU