Re: [m2m-iwg] propose name change

[Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not worried about collisions with the Eclipse IDE, in fact we should
> have an Eclipse IDE for IoT EPP package :)

Now I start to think M.E.A.T. is a good idea :)

>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes I know it is an acronym. I'm not an E(clipse)-d-IoT :)
>>
>> Anyway, this was only to avoid the aggregation with Eclipse IDE, and you
>> can find something more catchy and it also looks like some key working
>> groups are not carrying eclipse in their name (Polarsys, GeoTech, etc.).
>>
>>
>> Thu, December 12, 2013 14:03, Ian Skerrett wrote:
>> > Andy, your suggestions are always welcomed :)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > @Pascal you do realize IoT is an acronym?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Lots of people that I have upmost respect have suggestion to drop
>> > 'Open'.
>> > I
>> > am certainly fine with Eclipse IoT. On Tuesday, maybe we can finalize on
>> > a
>> > final name.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> > On
>> > Behalf Of Andy Piper
>> > Sent: December-12-13 5:59 PM
>> > To: m2m Industry Working Group
>> > Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] propose name change
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ... Eclipse of Things? Internet of Eclipse? Megaverse of Eclipse
>> > Automated
>> > Things aka MEAT?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ... I'll stop making "helpful suggestions" now! :-)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > <mailto:pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I like Eclipse IoT, but i think the initiative would also better be
>> > served
>> > by having an acronym that is easy to pronounce and remember.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2013-12-12, at 10:05 AM, Ian Craggs <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > <mailto:icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't know if I have a vote, but if I do, it's Eclipse IoT :-)
>> >
>> > I too was thinking that Eclipse already implies Open, so Open is
>> > superfluous.
>> >
>> > Ian
>> >
>> > On 12/12/13 13:40, Matteo Collina wrote:
>> >
>> > My 2 cents: Eclipse IoT.
>> >
>> > How about doing a poll?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Matteo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m2m-iwg mailing list
>> > m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m2m-iwg mailing list
>> > m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m2m-iwg mailing list
>> > m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Andy Piper | Kingston upon Thames, London (UK)
>> > blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
>> > twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m2m-iwg mailing list
>> > m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m2m-iwg mailing list
>> m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m2m-iwg mailing list
> m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>