Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP

From: Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:25:52 +0200
Delivered-to: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/m2m-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes ! it's applicable, it's a kind of light HTTP over UDP, it's used by (the yet to come) Open Mobile Alliance lightweight M2M and probably by the future One M2M standard.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Does anyone have experience with Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP). It certainly looks applicable in our space.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/

_______________________________________________
m2m-iwg mailing list
m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
  - From: Rick Bullotta

References:
- [m2m-iwg] COAP
  - From: Ian Skerrett

Prev by Date: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Next by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Previous by thread: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Next by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] COAP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs