Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping

From: "andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx" <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:57:24 +0000
Delivered-to: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/m2m-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/m2m-iwg>, <mailto:m2m-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

However, I believe a standard message representation for sensor data should emerge, one which includes all possible metadata to allow further consumption. That should at least support:

1) time
2) space (lat & long)
3) unit of measurements

This piece of the discussion - data representation - is something that the M2M IWG is looking into.

--
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk | skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper | images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping
  - From: Matteo Collina

References:
- Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping
  - From: UOMo
- Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping
  - From: Matteo Collina

Prev by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] Consumer device security (was: M3DA presentation)
Next by Date: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping
Previous by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping
Next by thread: Re: [m2m-iwg] MQTT <-> REST+websocket mapping
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs