Re: [m2m-iwg] FYI: The Internet of Things Consortium

["andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx" <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx>]

anyone responded to their email address pointing out our concerns / interest in participating / protocol thoughts?

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

“Ugh” is a good summary of my reaction as well :) 

 

Mike Milinkovich

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

+1.613.220.3223

 

From: Rick Bullotta [mailto:rick.bullotta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: January-07-13 5:35 PM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; m2m Industry Working Group
Subject: RE: [m2m-iwg] FYI: The Internet of Things Consortium

 

Thanks for sharing, Mike.

 

Interesting and annoying at the same time.  To declare home automation as “M2M” is exactly why terms like M2M and “Internet of Things” need to be segmented.  Forgive my skepticism, but I can’t envision the home/media automation crew designing M2M protocols that will work optimally for a connected insulin pump, a 20,000 KVA transformer, or an urban traffic network…

 

Ugh.

 

Rick

 

From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 5:21 PM
To: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [m2m-iwg] FYI: The Internet of Things Consortium

 

http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/07/internet-of-things-consortium/

 

Mike Milinkovich

Executive Director

Eclipse Foundation

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

+1.613.220.3223 mobile

+1.613.224.9461 x228 office

@mmilinkov

 

_______________________________________________
m2m-iwg mailing list
m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg

--
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper