Since I have not followed this thread closely I hesitate to jump in, but this statement is not accurate:"no commercial M2M product currently uses it."
Every customer (phone & m2m) of a major North American CDMA carrier use OMA-DM.
There are definitely m2m customers currently using OMA-DM today.
A. J. Dalola
Telit Wireless Solutions
Nicolas/all,
I spoke with Cinterion after my M2M presentation at Eclipse DemoCamp Berlin. They said, OMA-DM in its current phone and carrier driven form will hardly make it to play a relevant role for M2M. They did some investigation, but confirmed, no commercial M2M product
currently uses it.
If this was to change, then also that JCP JSR is "dormant" meaning, any company that is also a JCP Member could make use of what has been done so far and volunteer to take a new Spec Lead role in this standard.
At least in January during a JCP EC F2F Meeting we will have a chance to discuss these things further in California. Beside Cinterion others, especially the Open Geospatial Consortium Architecture Board meet the same week. And selected members of it are interested
to meet if we find an opportunity.
Kind Regards,
Werner
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:08 -0500
Von: m2m-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
An: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: m2m-iwg Digest, Vol 13, Issue 8
Send m2m-iwg mailing list submissions to
m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
m2m-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
m2m-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of m2m-iwg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re : OMA-DM? (Werner Keil)
2. November 27th M2M IWG Call (Scott de Deugd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:56:59 +0100
From: "Werner Keil" <werner.keil@xxxxxxx>
To: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [m2m-iwg] Re : OMA-DM?
Message-ID: <20121125185659.306800@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Nicolas,
Thanks, I should meet Cinterion and their newly elected JCP EC Representative tomorrow at DemoCamp Berlin.
Just in case you haven't seen it via the UOMo Docs page or Twitter, this is the SlideShare from Copenhagen also mentioning Sierra's solution here at CPH Airport:
http://www.slideshare.net/keilw/the-eclipse-m2m-iwg-and-standards-for-the-internet-of-things
As I presented Unit type-safe DSLs in Berlin this June I may cut the introduction shorter in Berlin, given the slot is the last one and I may not have more than ~30 minutes, but I guess I'll leave all the M2M Real Live Use Cases in there, plus one or two slides
on Cinterion as they are present to discuss in the Q&A.
If OMA-DM is such a widely used protocol, I guess a planned "Device Management" JSR for Embedded (based on Oracle's current Device Access API) might take it into consideration, even though the old JSR was withdrawn at the time.
So were e.g. 108 and both it and successors like 256 and 275 (voted down, while the "Final" 256 never got any adoption in real devices even from Nokia;-) which now gain momentum again through SensorWeb or Unit and Quantity-sensitive use cases like those on
Smart Container and Temperature Unit here.
Will reply any outcome of the discussion with Cinterion after the DemoCamp.
Kind Regards,
Werner
|
