Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [m2m-iwg] GigaOM Article

Rick,

 

My reaction was the same. The thing that really caught my eye though was that Intel put in €10 million for what seems to be a real long shot.

 

 

From: Rick Bullotta [mailto:rick.bullotta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: November-23-12 10:23 AM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; m2m Industry Working Group
Cc: m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] GigaOM Article

 

I read that last week and my thoughts were as follows:

 

- it will be extremely capital and cost intensive to build out the infrastructure and maintain it

- one way, push communications will limit future applications

- did they actually say "bits per second" ;-)

 

Perhaps a better approach would be to buy/lease the 2g infrastructure that the MNOs are planning to shut down?

 

I could be very wrong, but I think they have may difficult challenges ahead, with the larger ones being non technical. 



On Nov 23, 2012, at 9:47 AM, "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This start up is based in Toulouse, where apparently all the cool people live :)

 

http://gigaom.com/mobile/does-the-internet-of-things-need-its-own-internet/

 

Mike Milinkovich

+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx

 

_______________________________________________
m2m-iwg mailing list
m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg


Back to the top