[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [m2m-iwg] proposed agenda for M2M IWG call - Oct 9
|
Apparently the state of the art in medical device security is not that high
at the moment:
http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/319508,hacked-terminals-capable-of-causing
-pacemaker-mass-murder.aspx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Bullotta
> Sent: October-18-12 10:14 AM
> To: m2m Industry Working Group
> Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] proposed agenda for M2M IWG call - Oct 9
>
> The challenge with healthcare M2M applications, as Mats can attest to, is
that
> they typically represent much more than "data" integration. Key features
> like file/log transfers, software/firmware updates, and secure streaming
> (video, screen sharing, remote control) are often far more important to
the
> remote service applications than typical remote monitoring applications.
> There are also often some very demanding security and data isolation
> requirements (which vary by geography). I think it's a worthwhile use
case to
> consider for future use, but not one that the current technology stack
within
> the Eclipse M2M projects are well suited for at present. Perhaps there
are
> some "consumer oriented" healthcare applications that might be more of a
> fit (e.g. the "instrumented self" type of apps).
>
> Rick
> ThingWorx
>
> ________________________________________
> From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Scott de Deugd [dedeugd@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:03 AM
> To: m2m Industry Working Group
> Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] proposed agenda for M2M IWG call - Oct 9
>
> No problems Mats. Indeed I understand!
>
> We we talking over a question I brought up to be sure if we pick one
domain
> scenario like healthcare to drive the project work, that it can be
factored into
> cross-industry pieces vs what would be unique to healthcare. I am
confident
> that is possible, but wanted to see what everyone else thought. I'll
catch-up
> with you when I get the minutes together, or we can discuss on next call.
>
> ..............Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Mats Samuelsson <msamuelsson@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: m2m Industry Working Group <m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 10/17/2012 02:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] proposed agenda for M2M IWG call - Oct 9
> Sent by: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Scott,
>
> Sorry for missing out 15 minutes - I have mu SCRUM standups at 9:45 every
> day and like to participate in these!
>
> Mats
>
> Mats Samuelsson
> Axeda Corporation | Director Connectivity Product Management
> tel 508-530-5359 | mobile 508-333-3040
> msamuelsson@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:msamuelsson@xxxxxxxxx> |
>
> From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott de Deugd
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 5:27 PM
> To: m2m Industry Working Group
> Subject: [m2m-iwg] proposed agenda for M2M IWG call - Oct 9
>
> Ian has arranged a QEST Presentation by Maetto Collina. Depending on the
> time left we can cover other topics.
>
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Machine-to-
> Machine/M2MIWG/Weekly_call_minutes#October_9_.28proposed_agenda
> .29_______________________________________________
> m2m-iwg mailing list
> m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> m2m-iwg mailing list
> m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-iwg
