Re: [m2m-iwg] Agenda proposition for today's call

["Nipper, Arlen" <Arlen.Nipper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'll be glad to comment on the use/setup/management of Mosquito.

Cheers, Arlen

Arlen Nipper | President and CTO | Eurotech Inc. | O: +1 913.549.1013 | M: +1 913.406.1014 

arlen.nipper@xxxxxxxxxxxx | www.eurotech.com

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>, m2m Industry Working Group <m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:28 -0500
To: 'm2m Industry Working Group' <m2m-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [m2m-iwg] Agenda proposition for today's call

All,

 

Unfortunately I will not be able to join the call, as I am speaking at a conference.

 

I would suggest adding a conversation about Mosquitto (e.g. an MQTT server-side) and enabling a developer sandbox for M2M on eclipse.org infrastructure. We can provide the infrastructure, but someone (Arlen?) will have to put up the server and babysit it. Our sysadmins will be interested in hearing about the scalability, authentication and security aspects of the sandbox.

 

Thanks.

 

From: m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m2m-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Benjamin Cabé
Sent: November-15-11 6:14 AM
To: m2m Industry Working Group
Subject: [m2m-iwg] Agenda proposition for today's call

 

Hi,

 

Here is a suggestion of the topics we should cover during our call:

 

• EclipseCon feedback

• BoF session
• "Model-oriented" talks
• Hobbyist community

• Paho proposal: status, new interested parties
• Koneki update
• EclipseCon 2012

• Agree on the joint IWG talk proposal
• Other talks we should propose?

• Next steps

• Interested parties: update?
• Priorities definition

 

Cheers,

Ben -