RE: [m2m-dev] QVT models component

["Ed Willink" <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Fredieric, Quentin

> Quentin properly summarized the new committer policy.
> 
> I am glad that we now have a clean solution for the contribution of
> your QVT work into M2M.
> Thanks to you, we are making significant progress.

I'm afraid you do not seem to understand what we are discussing.

QVTR has requested use of the UMLX models. In order to make these more
sensibly available I have suggested making them available within M2M.
The models have been developed as part of the GMT project, for which
I have been a GMT committer for perhaps 5 years, rather longer than
nearly all M2M committers. The models are work in progress, so there
is no way I can be expected to deprive myself of update access.

The code is being transferred not contributed. The code comes with a
committer to maintain it. This is partly why I wanted to contribute
the models to the empty M2M infrastructure component; I have no desire to
take on responsibilities of committer for EMF and OCL and QVTR and QVTOM.
and conversely I certainly should not be an EMF or OCL committer.

If the code is to be partitioned between just QVTR and QVTOM then I
'only' need QVTR and QVTOM committer access. [I would still prefer to
put them all in M2M infrastructure.]

	Regards

		Ed Willink