Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [m2e-users] Maven packaging types and m2e-wtp

Hi Fred,

thanks for the feedback. Well, I am going to try reactivating our old plugin by forking the m2e-wtp config code over the weekend.

I hope that m2e 2.0 will address this issue making the our plugin unecessary in the future.

The other option would be to drop the support for our custom packaging types,
actively introducing boiler plate to a lot of our pom's.


Regards,

Nils


2014-08-01 14:34 GMT+02:00 Fred Bricon <fbricon@xxxxxxxxx>:
There's a similar request open at https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=412213
Please, state your requirements over there, so we make sure to cover a wider range of use cases when a proper solution can be implemented. Chances are it'll require some breaking changes in m2e-wtp, requiring a bump to version 2.0. 

It's preferable we continue this discussion over at m2e-wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

As of today, your only alternative is to fork the interesting classes to match the required behavior.

FYI, I'll basically be away from anything programming stuff related till september 1st

Fred Bricon



On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Nils Liebelt <nils.liebelt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

we have a custom packaging type for war artefacts that executes a few additional goals specific to our needs
extending the default war lifecycle. The custom packaging works create on the commandline but importing
these projects into the eclipse ide leaves us with a project that is not deployable to an wtp target (tomcat). 

What is the easiest way to tell m2e, m2e-wtp to treat this project like an "normal" war project?

As far as I understand m2e-wtp only executes the wtp special configuration for packaging types mentioned here:
http://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e-wtp/org.eclipse.m2e.wtp.git/tree/org.eclipse.m2e.wtp/src/org/eclipse/m2e/wtp/ProjectConfiguratorDelegateFactory.java

The WebProjectConfiguratorDelegate that actually carries out the configuration work is also only package visible.
In the past I wrote plugin that used reflection to make the plugins internal code accessible and delegate to it
but with our recent upgrade to Kepler I revisited the code and it just felt so wrong..

Generally I would like to avoid implementing an eclipse plugin in order to not tie our "platform" to an eclipse
release.


Best regards,

Nils


_______________________________________________
m2e-users mailing list
m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users



--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd

_______________________________________________
m2e-users mailing list
m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users


Back to the top