[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [m2e-users] Packaging type 'bundle' prevents 'Maven Dependencies'
|
Thanks for the speedy reply Igor. It builds fine on the command line under mvn 3.0.3. It appears that it is in fact using pax:compile as the compiler, which would explain the behaviour given your comment. Nice pick. Is there anything that can be done from outside m2e (plugins, or changes to maven-pax-compiler), to help this?
Lindsay
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:04:26 +0400
From: Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [m2e-users] Packaging type 'bundle' prevents 'Maven
Dependencies' from being created
Message-ID: <4E2CEB4A.3010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Does the project build successfully on command line using maven 3.0.2?
What compiler does the project use (pax:compile, for example, is NOT supported by m2e at the moment).
Generally, m2e is expected to resolve project dependencies and setup Maven Dependencies classpath container for all projects that use maven-compiler-plugin with compilerId=javac.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 11-07-25 7:31 AM, Lindsay Smith wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I?m experimenting with a clean eclipse 3.7 installation, and I?ve
> installed m2e from the eclipse update site. On the whole it looks
> slick, very nice.
>
> However I have an issue ? my projects have packaging type ?bundle?. It
> should be treated like a Java project, but when the project is set up
> I don?t the ?Maven Dependencies?. I?ve seen some comments around this
> area, such as this bug:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=337010
>
> However this problem is still happening for these ?bundle? projects.
> They have, naturally, plugins configured in the pom that handle this
> packaging type.
>
> If I switch the packaging type to ?jar? and update the project
> configuration, I get the correct dependency group. I can then switch
> it back and it stays around, so that?s my workaround at this stage.
>
> Thanks
>
> Lindsay
