| Hi Igor
I have uploaded/attached two patches for "Bug 361824 - Regression[MNGECLIPSE-767]Path must include project and resource name: /" One is for the product and the other is the new test case.
I signed the CLA.
Btw I was able to set the timeout e.g -Dtycho.surefire.timeout=1200
Cheers Lucas
16 sep 2013 kl. 17:44 skrev Igor Fedorenko: @Fred I am fine using the new CLA process, but I don't want to remember
two ways of doing things. Unless there are any objections, can you
update m2e dev env wiki to indicate that m2e patches require signed
eclipse CLA from now on?
@Lucas since we just decided to use the new process, you can either
sign the CLA or provide a patch with three questions in the comment.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-16 10:18 AM, Fred Bricon wrote:
as per Mike's blog [1] : " So starting immediately, you will be able to
refer to a CLA rather than asking the “three questions” on a bug".
Now you can still chose to enforce the policy you want AFAUI
[1] http://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/eclipse-clas-are-live/
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Fred,
Are you saying that eclipse legal poster is outdated? Do you have a link
that explains the new ip process?
As far as I am concerned, m2e still uses ip process documented in the
poster and I will ask for the answers to the three questions unless
somebody tells me we can't do it any more.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-16 9:56 AM, Fred Bricon wrote:
Lucas, I believe you need to sign Eclipse's CLA[1]
quote :
"To complete and submit a CLA, log into the Eclipse projects forge
<https://projects.eclipse.org/__user/login/sso
<https://projects.eclipse.org/user/login/sso>>[2] (you will need to
create an account with the Eclipse Foundation if you have not
already
done so); click on "Contributor License Agreement"; and Complete the
form. Be sure to use the same email address when you register
for the
account that you intend to use when you commit to Git."
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/__CLA.php
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/CLA.php>
[2]
https://dev.eclipse.org/site___login/?takemeback=https://__projects.eclipse.org/user/__login/sso
<https://dev.eclipse.org/site_login/?takemeback=https://projects.eclipse.org/user/login/sso>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Igor Fedorenko
<igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
On 2013-09-16 9:11 AM, Lucas Persson wrote:
Hi Igor
I got four questions
1)
When I run the tests on my OSX box the tests seems to
timout
contacting
the spawned Eclipse/SWT app.
Is there a way to increase the timout?
I am not sure. I am on OSX and don't have this problem and
haven't heard
about it either. It may be specific to your environment or
the way
you run the tests. What is exact error message and stack
trace you get?
2)
You said I should add a regression test for the patch.
Do you want me to add the tests to
"org.eclipse.m2e.tests" project or is there some other
project
that is
the preferred?
Yes, this the right project.
3)
I was planning to call the test class something like
Bug361824BuildPathsTest.java
Is that inline with your conventions?
I suggest you add test361824_____targetFolderOutsideBasedir
test to
existing
BuildPathManagerTest. If the test needs a test project, put
it under
projects/test361824_____targetFolderOutsideBasedir.
4)
The IP statement in the patch.
I am happy to use whatever you guys are using as
default IP.
I suppose it is EPL.
Can you update me on the exact quote I need to use in
the patch
comment?
It has to be EPL.
The three questions are from eclipse legal poster [1],
figure 11b.
Usually people write something like
* I confirm that I wrote 100% of the code
* I confirm that I have the right to contribute the
code to Eclipse
* I confirm that the file headers contain the
appropriate License
header
To be perfectly honest, I don't know what exactly the last
question is
meant to convey, so please ask eclipse legal team for
explanation if you
are not comfortable with it.
[1]
http://www.eclipse.org/legal/____EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/__EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf>
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/__EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
<http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf>>
--
Regards,
Igor
Thanks
Lucas
4 sep 2013 kl. 16:25 skrev Igor Fedorenko:
Sorry, wrong command, you need to run
mvn clean install -Pits,uts
-Dm2e-core.url="" href="file:///path-____to-locally-built-m2e">file:///path-____to-locally-built-m2e
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-04 9:48 AM, Lucas Persson wrote:
Hi Igor
OK, I will do the patch on master then.
But when I compile the tests I get this error:
[ERROR] Cannot resolve project dependencies:
[ERROR] Software being installed:
org.eclipse.m2e.tests 1.5.0.qualifier
[ERROR] Missing requirement:
com.ning.async-http-client
1.6.5.20130902-0741 requires 'package org.slf4j
1.6.2'
but it could not
be found
I do not see that slf4j is downloaded or so.
When I compile the tests I set
the
-Declipse-repo.url="" href="file:///____path-to-locally-built-m2e">file:///____path-to-locally-built-m2e
to the unzipped
site.
Eg unzip
org.eclipse.m2e.site-1.5.0-____SNAPSHOT.zip
Is that the way to do it?
Thanks
Lucas
4 sep 2013 kl. 13:35 skrev Igor Fedorenko:
There were few tags I had forgot to push,
m2e-1.4.0.20130601-0317 should
work for m2e 1.4.x now.
Do note that we will only accept patches
that apply
and work with latest
master HEAD, we do not generally accept patches
against older versions.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-04 5:46 AM, Lucas Persson wrote:
Hi again
Which tag in the git repo for the tests
corresponds with the
release tag
of "releases/1.4/1.4.0.20130601-____0317"?
I do not see any obvious candidate:
$ git tag
0.10.0.20100205-2200
0.10.1.20100510-1546
0.10.2.20100623-1649
0.11.0.20100811-1422
0.11.1.20100927-1222
0.12.0.20101115-1102
0.13.0.20110321-1300
0.13.snapshot
MoveToEclipse
cq-4572
m2e-1.0.100.20110804-1717
m2e-1.1.0.20120530-0009
m2e-1.3.0.20130129-0926
"trunk" or main or head or what ever it is
called in git seems to
assume
m2e is at version 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT so
that will
not work with the m2e
stuff that I build from tag
"releases/1.4/1.4.0.20130601-____0317"
Thanks
Lucas
3 sep 2013 kl. 17:49 skrev Igor Fedorenko:
The patch has to be attached to
bugzilla and
has to have IP-related
statement in the commit comment.
This is
Eclipse legal process
requirement.
To run m2e automated tests from IDE,
right-click on
org.eclipse.m2e.tests project, run
as junit
plugin test.
Alternatively,
you can run the test from command
line using
mvn clean install -Pits,uts
-Declipse-repo.url="" href="file:///____path-to-locally-built-m2e">file:///____path-to-locally-built-m2e
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-03 11:37 AM, Lucas
Persson wrote:
Ok
Is there some instructions on
how to run
the tests (the ones in your
other git repo )?
I generated the patch using git
format-patch so I thought it
would be
correct....
Kind regards
Lucas
3 sep 2013 kl. 17:16 skrev Igor
Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>>__:
Lucas,
If you'd like to see this patch
integrated in m2e, you'd
need to
submit
it as git-format-patch
formatted
patches attached to eclipse
bugzilla
and must have IP-raleted
statement
in the commit comment (see
[1] for
details).
You will also need to provide
corresponding automated
regression
test.
[1]
http://wiki.eclipse.org/M2E_____Development_Environment
<http://wiki.eclipse.org/M2E___Development_Environment>
<http://wiki.eclipse.org/M2E___Development_Environment
<http://wiki.eclipse.org/M2E_Development_Environment>>
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-03 11:02 AM, Lucas
Persson wrote:
Hi Igor
Here is a patch that will
support to have the
build folder
outside
the project's folder.
For sure it will fix the
exception at
org.eclipse.m2e.core.project.____configurator.____AbstractLifecycleMapping.____configure(____AbstractLifecycleMapping.java:____71).
I also updated the
AbstractClasspathProvider in the
M2E JDT plugin
so that JUnit works in
such cases.
The patch (attached) is
based on
a branch on release tag of
"releases/1.4/1.4.0.20130601-____0317"
By this patch the bug
"<https://bugs.eclipse.org/____bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/__bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824>
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/__bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824>>>
-Regression[MNGECLIPSE-767]____Path
must include project and
resource name: /" will
be fixed.
Also if this is added
the the
root pom.xml
<pluginExecution>
<pluginExecutionFilter>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.____plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-____plugin</artifactId>
<versionRange>[2.0,)</____versionRange>
<goals>
<goal>compile</goal>
<goal>testCompile</goal>
</goals>
<parameters>
<compilerId>javac</compilerId>
</parameters>
</pluginExecutionFilter>
<action>
<ignore></ignore>
</action>
</pluginExecution>
and given that the
.classpatch
and .project looks OK
It will be possible to
have the
build folder outside
the project's
folder.
(As mentioned in the
above bug)
The support will not be
that
smooth since the
.classpath must be
correct for the beginning
instead of generated by
m2e.
But it will work.
Typical .classpath and
.project
<classpath>
<classpathentry kind="src"
path="src/main/java" />
<classpathentry kind="src"
path="src/main/resources" />
<classpathentry kind="src"
path="src/test/java"
output="target/test-classes"/>
<classpathentry kind="con"
path="org.eclipse.jdt.____launching.JRE_CONTAINER"/>
<classpathentry kind="con"
path="org.eclipse.m2e.MAVEN2_____CLASSPATH_CONTAINER"/>
<classpathentry
kind="output"
path="target/classes"/>
</classpath>
<?xml version="1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?>
<projectDescription>
<name>my-jar-artifactId1</____name>
<comment />
<projects />
<buildSpec>
<buildCommand>
<name>org.eclipse.jdt.core.____javabuilder</name>
<arguments />
</buildCommand>
<buildCommand>
<name>org.eclipse.m2e.core.____maven2Builder</name>
<arguments />
</buildCommand>
</buildSpec>
<natures>
<nature>org.eclipse.jdt.core.____javanature</nature>
<nature>org.eclipse.m2e.core.____maven2Nature</nature>
</natures>
<linkedResources>
<link>
<name>target</name>
<type>2</type>
<locationURI>M2_TARGET/org.____example.groupId1/my-jar-____artifactId1/target</____locationURI>
</link>
</linkedResources>
</projectDescription>
M2_TARGET must be
defined in the
workspace and point to
the top
"target" folder outside
the SCM
area.
Thanks
Lucas
27 aug 2013 kl. 14:10
skrev Igor
Fedorenko:
I think it is
reasonable to
patch
AbstractLifecycleMapping#____configure
to
tolerate
projectFacade.____getProjectRelativePath
returning null. I
believe
this was the indent
of the
code, so the
exception you
get is a
bug.
Please provide a
quality
patch (including
regression
tests)
and I'll
review it.
To use different
AbstractLifecycleMapping
implementation, you
need to
1. define
org.eclipse.m2e.core.____lifecycleMappings
extension
2. in (parent) pom.xml
specific m2e
lifecycle mapping
configuration
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.eclipse.m2e</____groupId>
<artifactId>lifecycle-mapping<____/artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<configuration>
<lifecycleMappingMetadata>
<lifecycleMappings>
<lifecycleMapping>
<packagingType>...</____packagingType>
<lifecycleMappingId>...</____lifecycleMappingId>
</lifecycleMapping>
</lifecycleMappings>
</lifecycleMappingMetadata>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
You will have to define
mapping for all
packaging
types you use in
your
project.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-08-27 4:42
AM, Lucas
Persson wrote:
Hi
I have defined
that the
target folder (and
target/classes)
shall be
outside the
project's
folder.
The reason to
have it
like this is
that I am
using a
proprietary SCM
which do not
allow write
access unless a
file is
checkout out.
And alas it
does not
have any type of
"ignore" filter.
The thing is
that every
time I do
"Maven->Update
Project..." it
fails
like this:
An internal error
occurred during:
"Updating Maven
Project".
Path must include
project and
resource
name: /tiget-api
java.lang.____IllegalArgumentException:
Path must include
project and
resource name:
/tiget-api
at
org.eclipse.core.runtime.____Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:63)
at
org.eclipse.core.internal.____resources.Workspace.____newResource(Workspace.java:____2163)
at
org.eclipse.core.internal.____resources.Container.getFolder(____Container.java:222)
at
org.eclipse.m2e.core.project.____configurator.____AbstractLifecycleMapping.____configure(____AbstractLifecycleMapping.java:____71)
I am not sure
what m2e
does here but I
guess it
is updating the
output
folder (among
other things)
The code that
sort of
breaks is this:
org.eclipse.m2e.core.project.____configurator.____AbstractLifecycleMapping,
method
"configure()"
/**
* Calls
#configure
method of all
registered
project
configurators
*/
public void
configure(____ProjectConfigurationRequest
request,
IProgressMonitor mon)
throws
CoreException {
final SubMonitor
monitor =
SubMonitor.convert(mon, 5);
try {
MavenPlugin.____getProjectConfigurationManager____().addMavenBuilder(request.____getProject(),
null
/*description*/,
monitor.newChild(1));
IMavenProjectFacade
projectFacade =
request.getMavenProjectFacade(____);
MavenProject
mavenProject =
request.getMavenProject();
Build build =
mavenProject.getBuild();
if(build
!= null) {
String
directory
=
build.getDirectory();
if(directory !=
null) {
*IContainer
container =
projectFacade.getProject().____getFolder(projectFacade.____getProjectRelativePath(____directory));*
if(container !=
null) {
if(!container.exists()
&& container
instanceof
IFolder) {
M2EUtils.createFolder((____IFolder)
container, true,
monitor.newChild(1));
} else {
container.setDerived(true,
monitor.newChild(1));
}
}
}
}
It seems that
*projectFacade.____getProjectRelativePath(____directory)
*returns
null when the
pom.xml
defines that
the build
folder is
outside the
project's folder.
and that leads to
exception in
*projectFacade.getProject().____getFolder()
*instead of
returning a
NULL IContainer
(which
the code seems to
assume).
Is there a way to
"override"
org.eclipse.m2e.jdt.internal.____JarLifecycleMapping
so
I can
make my own
patched version?
It seems to be
a bug on
this: *Bug 361824*
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/____bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/__bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824>
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/__bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=361824>>>
-Regression[MNGECLIPSE-767]____Path
must include
project and
resource name: /
(when this is
fixed I
will have to
implement a
project
configurator that
fixes the build
folder
anyway but the
above
issue is
blocking me
since
project
configurations
are called
further down
in the method.)
I am using m2e
version
1.4.0_20130601-0317
Thanks
Lucas
--
Lucas Persson |
Principal Member of
Technical Staff
Phone:
+4684773644 <tel:%2B4684773644>
<tel:%2B4684773644> | |
| Mobile:
+46730946656 <tel:%2B46730946656>
<tel:%2B46730946656>
Oracle
Communications
Platform
ORACLE Sweden |
Söder
Mälarstrand 29,
6 tr |
118 25 Stockholm
Oracle Svenska AB,
Kronborgsgränd
17, S-164
28 KISTA,
reg.no <http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>. 556254-6746
Oracle is
committed to
developing
practices and
products that
help
protect the
environment
___________________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing
list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/____mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>>
___________________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/____mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>>
Lucas Persson |
Principal Member
of Technical Staff
Phone: +4684773644
<tel:%2B4684773644>
<tel:%2B4684773644> | | |
Mobile: +46730946656
<tel:%2B46730946656>
<tel:%2B46730946656>
Oracle Communications
Platform
ORACLE Sweden | Söder
Mälarstrand 29, 6 tr |
118 25
Stockholm
Oracle Svenska AB,
Kronborgsgränd 17, S-164 28
KISTA, reg.no
<http://reg.no> <http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>
<http://reg.no>.
556254-6746
Oracle is committed to
developing practices and
products that help
protect the environment
___________________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/____mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>>
___________________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/____mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>>
___________________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/____mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>
<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev>>
___________________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
_______________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
_______________________________________________
m2e-dev mailing list
m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
--  Lucas Persson | Principal Member of Technical Staff Phone: +4684773644 | | | Mobile: +46730946656 Oracle Communications Platform ORACLE Sweden | Söder Mälarstrand 29, 6 tr | 118 25 Stockholm Oracle Svenska AB, Kronborgsgränd 17, S-164 28 KISTA, reg.no. 556254-6746  Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment |
