Re: [m2e-dev] [m2e-users] moving m2e to java7 past kepler sr0

[Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We obviously want to avoid "alienating significant part of m2e users",
and this is exactly why I asked the question instead of just making the
change.

I fully realize some users will not be able to upgrade their java
version and will have to stay on an older version of m2e. Problem is, we
don't have any data to judge what proportion of users will and will not
be able to upgrade because of java version.

Also, I honestly believe that my productivity and productivity of other
m2e developers and contributors is more important for m2e project than
costs savings "IT department of a large bank" might get by sticking to
an old java version.

--
Regards,
Igor

On 2013-05-30 2:59 PM, Tonny Madsen wrote:
> Igor,
>
> You write: "Does anyone have a good reasons to stay with java 6 past
> this coming
> June? ("my IT department is too retarded to allow java7" is probably not
> a good reason)."
>
> I don't know if you ever worked in the IT department of a large bank,
> offshore consultancy company or a similar institution, but... these
> organizations want to control the amount of support and maintenance by
> locking down the used platforms. "Retarded"??? I'm pretty sure most IT
> people would make the same choices given the available resources in the
> IT departments!
>
> Java 7 might make your life easier, but is that really reason enough to
> alienate an insignificant part of your users?
>
> /Tonny
>
> --
> Tonny Madsen
> My profiles: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/tonnymadsen> Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/tonnymadsen> Blogger
> <http://tonnymadsen.blogspot.dk/> SlideShare
> <http://www.slideshare.net/nonty>
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     I'd like to propose moving m2e to require java7 execution environment
>     after Kepler SR0 is out. I am getting really addicted to
>     try-with-resources syntax [1], and with java6 past it's eol [2] already,
>     I see little/no reasons to stick with this version any longer.
>
>     Does anyone have a good reasons to stay with java 6 past this coming
>     June? ("my IT department is too retarded to allow java7" is probably not
>     a good reason).
>
>     [1]
>     http://docs.oracle.com/javase/__tutorial/essential/exceptions/__tryResourceClose.html
>     <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html>
>     [2] http://www.oracle.com/__technetwork/java/eol-135779.__html
>     <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html>
>
>     --
>     Regards,
>     Igor
>     _________________________________________________
>     m2e-users mailing list
>     m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
>     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m2e-users mailing list
> m2e-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users