Re: [m2e-dev] m2e-{checkstyle,pmd}

[Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Can you elaborate on "some improvements come down the m2e core pipe"
part? What exactly do you need from m2e core to make checkstyle/pmd
integration work better?

--
Regards,
Igor

On 11-01-05 03:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Disrepair? I'd be happy to pull any changes you've made to mine. It
> works, in some respect, about as well as it is likely to until some
> improvements come down the m2e core pipe, but I'll take any fixes.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, JAmes Atwill<jatwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm looking for feedback; there are currently two projects it various state
> > of disrepair for integrating Checkstyle ( via
> >   http://eclipse-cs.sourceforge.net/ ) and PMD (
> > via http://pmd.sourceforge.net/eclipse/ ) through m2e.  The second being a
> > fork of the first:
> >    http://code.google.com/p/m2e-extensions/
> >    http://bimargulies.github.com/m2e-code-quality/
> > I have a third project which patches the second to fix a number of
> > include/exclude issues.  As m2e gains more traction, developers will write
> > m2e extensions to scratch various itches.  Also, I imagine the m2e API will
> > change a fair bit over the next 12 months.
> > Is there an overall suggestions as to where these should live and be listed?
> > Should the m2e integrations live with m2e, the original plugin or a third
> > project?
> >     JAmes
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m2e-dev mailing list
> > m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
> _______________________________________________
> m2e-dev mailing list
> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev