| Re: [lyo-dev] FW: OSLC vs Jena |
Hi, Yes you are right I missed the header OSLC-Core-Version = 2.0 in the Rest Client, but used it in the code. The overall question remains but with a different explanation: I am trying out if it is possible to replace an existing “home-made” OSLC solution by using Lyo. So I got some questions in the code example below. Not sure if I misunderstand the Lyo API or if it is some limitations in the current implementation, perhaps in the future getResources (e.g. method that returns array of resources) will exist in the OSLCClient. // sample based on the RRCFormSample String catalogUrl = helper.getCatalogUrl(); ServiceProviderCatalog catalog = client.getResource(catalogUrl,OslcMediaType.APPLICATION_RDF_XML).getEntity(ServiceProviderCatalog.class); ServiceProvider[] serviceProviders = catalog.getServiceProviders(); for (ServiceProvider serviceProvider : serviceProviders) { URI about = serviceProvider.getAbout(); // this returns the first service, but what about retrieving the next? OSLC Core Spec 2.0 ServiceProvider oslc:service states one-or-many Service service = client.getResource(about.toString(),OslcMediaType.APPLICATION_RDF_XML).getEntity(Service.class); // this returns a “random” prefixDefinition, but what about retrieving the next? OSLC Core Spec 2.0 ServiceProvider oslc:prefixDefinition states zero-or-many PrefixDefinition prefixDefinition = client.getResource(about.toString(),OslcMediaType.APPLICATION_RDF_XML).getEntity(PrefixDefinition.class); } BR Cecilia Lindgren From: lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Fiedler It normally does. Cecilia, were you using the OslcClient for your request? or just a Wink client. If you can provide a snippet of your code (here or in a Bugzilla), that would help. Regards, Mike On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: If it is only expecting 2.0, seems like the lib should be sending that header by default. - Steve On Nov 9, 2012 10:16 AM, "Samuel Padgett" <spadgett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi, Cecelia. This looks like an OSLC 1.0 response, whereas Lyo is expecting an OSLC 2.0 response. You should try adding the request header
|
