[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian
|
On 12-08-30 12:27 PM, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to use the stock LTTng plugin that came with the Eclipse IDE
> for C/C++ Developers, Juno (version number looks like
> 1.0.0.201206130106) in order to view Kernel CTF traces generated by
> LTTng 2.0 on two different embedded targets (ARM and PowerPC).
>
> While on ARM (little endian) everything seems to work fine, on PowerPC
> (big endian) I get absolutely meaningless timestamps, ranging to years
> 2050, 2145, and so on...
> I get huge gaps (as I see only the time of day part, it looks like
> hours, but it might be as well be years!) between consecutive events.
>
> Groups of adjacent events do sometimes get displayed with reasonably
> close timestamps though (I guess for those events which got dumped with
> a compact representation of the timestamp and/or header).
>
> The output of babeltrace for the same trace looks OK.
>
> Any other fields (pids, tids, task names, etc..) which would be affected
> by a global endianness problem still look OK, so it's definitely
> something related to timestamps.
>
> Any ideas? Shall I send the affected trace?
I cannot say yes enough to having big endian traces for testing.
To be honest, we only had x86 traces to test on so far.
Thanks for providing this info.
>
> Thank you,
> Gerlando
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
