[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gerrit merge strategy

I wouldn't mind it if the dependencies problem is fixed now.


On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir
<alexandre.montplaisir@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> We've been using the new Gerrit for the past week, and we're loving it ;)
> However I've noticed the merge strategy in the Project Options is set to
> "Merge If Necessary", which is the default value. This creates a lot of
> empty merge commits if the commit we're merging wasn't based exactly on
> the latest master.
> What would you guys think about using the "Cherry-pick" option instead?
> It means that every patch gets rebased on the master before being
> merged. This would guarantee that the git history remains linear, which
> makes it much easier to bisect, and is prettier in general.
> CDT had a similar discussion in the past, see
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=375448
> Now they are indeed using the "Cherry-pick" option.
> Cheers,
> --
> Alexandre Montplaisir
> DORSAL lab,
> Ãcole Polytechnique de MontrÃal
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev