Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:45:02 -0400
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

> >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> >LinuxTools.
> 
> I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.

I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it.  It just
wasn't part of the original workflows of a lot of the plugins we have.

Maybe a good general theme for Kepler?  :)

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Xavier Raynaud
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Daniel HB
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Marc Khouzam

References:
- [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Xavier Raynaud
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Daniel HB
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Marc Khouzam
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
  - From: Xavier Raynaud

Prev by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
Next by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
Previous by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
Next by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs