[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Eclipse Build 0.6.0?
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-08-10 03:19, Matt Whitlock wrote:
> After bringing all the dependencies up to date and jumping through the usual hoops, I get hit with this:
>
> [...]
>
> Unless NO_ELEMENT is null (which it isn't), that code cannot possibly be correct. The compiler is right to complain about it. Please see the attached patch for a correct implementation that compiles cleanly.
>
> After applying the attached patch, Eclipse 3.6 builds successfully on Gentoo. :-)
>
>
> On Monday, 9 August 2010, at 4:43 pm, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>> * Matt Whitlock <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-08-09 16:39]:
>>> Linux Tools 0.6.0 has been out for a while, but there is still no Eclipse Build 0.6.0?
>>
>> I'm going to tag it tomorrow :) In the meantime, can you build from SVN
>> trunk with this tarball and see if it all works on Gentoo?
>>
>> http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/linuxtools/eclipse-build/e36-branch/eclipse-3.6.0-src-noxpt.tar.bz2
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Hi
Maybe we should also consider backporting the patch for 321926[1]
(assuming e-b has not been tagged already).
NB: The patch has not been reviewed yet, but it hopefully fixes a
compiler optimization that causes invalid byte code.
~Niels
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=321926
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=176134
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEAREIAAYFAkxhCNUACgkQVCqoiq1YlqxbjACgpltMJRkg9UsiFpLxa6lBc5RN
NvYAnA1nn5Eo7yRYsJ5XEc05UTz0EEzK
=G9DV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
