| [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] Patch review request |
Hi, I request a patch review for these Debian patches. I recommend to process the patches in the same order as in this mail. Start with an easy one: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319474 These four patches are required to recompile binary files that shouldn't be shipped in the source tarball: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=304710 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319479 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319476 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319478 Once you have applied these four patches, you can apply the patch from https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=304112 Last, but not least: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319473 Some additional questions: Why does the layout of svn repository differ from the layout of the source tarballs? Are there any reasons for having eclipse-build-additionalArchs.tar.bz2 and eclipse-build-generatedScripts.tar.bz2 as tarballs instead of having them in subdirectories? -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil