Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February

From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:29:21 -0500
Delivered-to: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/linuxtools-dev>
List-help: <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev>, <mailto:linuxtools-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

Hi Francois,

> We don't *distribute* that library, we only provide instructions on
> how to download, compile, install and configure it.
> 
> Do we really need a CQ for that?

Yes, any and all dependencies need CQs, too.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
  - From: John Arthorne
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
  - From: Xavier RAYNAUD

References:
- [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
  - From: Andrew Overholt
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
  - From: Francois Chouinard
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
  - From: Andrew Overholt
- Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
  - From: Francois Chouinard

Prev by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
Next by Date: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
Previous by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
Next by thread: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Helios IP Reviews due by 5 February
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs