|Re: [libra-dev] Virgo IDE Refactoring|
Thanks for putting so much energy into this. For some clarification of how I've been looking at that particular bug, place see: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=329198#c20. I think perhaps the overall scope had become too broad for that one single bug, and I also don't want to predispose where we should be putting our energies. It may be that the most low-hanging fruit or most community interest is in supporting stuff in the context of WTP deployments, in which case that should drive our efforts. I really appreciate how much Libra has been willing to extend itself in terms of taking on some of this stuff; I think for sure broadening the availability of these tools to the largest possible set of consumers is the way to go.
It occurs to be that perhaps we should have some kind of conf call -- or given our various geographic locations maybe at least a bug or Wiki to see where we see things getting distributed and divide effort and codebase accordingly. Leo and I are going to have a follow-up email about some other pieces that overlap current Virgo / Libra boundary, and now might be a good time to go through this stuff systematically.
On 2012-03-15, at 9:52 AM, Naci Dai wrote: