Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [koneki-dev] [technology-pmc] Koneki 1.1 release
+1

Wayne

On 01/14/2014 12:23 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
That's a reasonable stance which I would support if we assume that there is no IP Log issues and this was just a one time mistake (given the release history of the project).


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik <konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think we should ask the legal team how far away they are on IP Log approval. If it’s going to be approved very soon, then I don’t see much sense of putting the community through the disruption of pulling a release while the rest of the release review completes.

 

- Konstantin

 

 

From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:07 AM
To: Technology PMC
Cc: development dicussions for the Koneki project
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Koneki 1.1 release

 

Mistakes happen, we're human!

 

I'm trying to recall the last time this happened but my guess is that we'll have to pull the release and get the official votes in.

 

I like to be practical and let it slide in this case IMHO, goes against the dev process and at the foundation, we always guarantee that public releases go through IP review. It's one of the high quality markings of the Eclipse Foundation IMHO.

 

Any other opinions from the Tech PMC before we make the project pull the release and go for a vote?

 

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Benjamin Cabé <bcabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi PMC, (cc’ing koneki-dev mailing-list too)

 

We would like to request your approval for the release of Koneki 1.1, for which documentation is available at [1], and IP log is pending approval.

The weird thing here is that we made a mistake in that the bits are already public. This is totally my bad – the team has done a great job at publishing all the milestones on time, keeping the project plan up-to-date, etc. and everything was going so smoothly that the 1.1 actually ended up being released without going through a review. 

Please advise on how you want us to proceed with this release: do you approve it a priori? should we unpublish the bits and release again? …

 

FWIW in the near future we want to restructure Koneki to run Lua Development Tools as an independent Tools project. This is still WIP but initial thoughts are available here [2].

 

 

Again, I apologize for the mess – hope we’ll find a way to fix the mistake and release properly,

Thanks a lot,

Benjamin-- 

 


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc



 

--
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc




--
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 512 961 6719

--
Wayne Beaton on behalf of the Eclipse Management Organization
EclipseCon 2014

Back to the top