AW: [jwt-dev] JWT meta model changes

["Florian Lautenbacher" <lautenbacher@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chris,

thanks for the detailed list. I have some objections of unifying the
DecisionNode/MergeNode and ForkNode/JoinNode while removing those nodes at
the same time (I'm not sure whether this was the intended meaning of
unification); as those nodes are typical for UML and are heavily used in all
of our models as well as have different EditPartPolicies I would like to see
those elements stay but rather get more abstract nodes *additionally*. What
do others think about it?

Concerning the attribute informationType I'm unsure whether our Indian
colleagues are using it and if yes, for which purpose. I think I've once
seen a model which made use of them.

I'm not sure who currently uses the primitive types, so I would agree to
remove those, too.

Concerning the swimlanes: is there already a decision whether the GSoC
student can assist us here?

Best regards,

Florian


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Christian Saad
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. April 2010 17:29
An: Java Workflow Toolbox
Betreff: [jwt-dev] JWT meta model changes

Hi guys,

the long overdue list of proposed metamodel changes. This is supposed to 
become the detailled list of changes which will then be applied to the 
meta model once everybody gives their +1

Regards,
Chris