Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
AW: [jwt-dev] Release Review, N&N

Hi Chris,
 
I adapted the sentence about version 0.6 as you put it. Concerning the logos: since they belong to other organizations, we would probably need some legal notice at the end when we want to use them (the BPMN-logo is a trademark of the OMG, etc.). I'm not even sure if we would not already need some legal notices since we say something about BPMN, XPDL and jPDL (even without showing their logos). I'm not an IP expert, so if the others think that puting these logos would not be a problem, then I can add them in order to motivate JWT some more.
 
Regards,
 
Florian


Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Christian Saad
Gesendet: 26 May 2009 16:28
An: 'Java Workflow Toolbox'
Betreff: AW: [jwt-dev] Release Review, N&N

Hi all,

 

I think the N&N document captures very well the basics and the recent changes of JWT. If there aren’t any additional requirements (e.g. things that everyone else has on their N&N and we don’t) I would think that we could leave it at this?

 

For the short version of the review slides, I think we just need to add the views and aspects to the 0.6 improvements (e.g. “This release (version 0.6) covers several bugfixes and improvements to the Workflow Editor, additional Views, the possibility to enrich the meta-model with custom elements, new Transformations and new code in the Runtime component.”) Maybe we could put the logos representing the many different bpm standards from the eclipsecon presentation on the intro page?

 

Regards,

Chris

 

Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Florian Lautenbacher
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009 11:53
An: 'Java Workflow Toolbox'
Betreff: [jwt-dev] Release Review, N&N

 

Hi there,

 

I started working on the New&Noteworthy document. In order to easier work together, I created a Wiki page [1] which includes already the structure and first content. Please feel free to add, change or remove anything there. Once we know whether we need to have an HTML file or whether a wiki page is enough, I will probably adapt it to HTML.

 

Since in my opinion we already have the long version of the release review slides finished (please find my latest version attached), I started also with a short version of the slides as requested by Wayne. This shall as a maximum contain 4 slides. There is still some space in my version of the slides that we can fill. Please feel free to add things and send the slides in a new version back again.

 

Once we have the summary slides finished, too, I will send both to EMO (latest by Friday, but as Wayne has mentioned: the earlier, the better).

 

Thanks for your support and best regards,

 

Florian

 


Back to the top