[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
AW: AW: [jwt-dev] New JWT integration build
|
Hi Mickael,
we already had this discussion before. I think it depends on how other
projects do the same. I personally would prefer the solution with an S or I
at the end and not at the beginning of the date/time. For testing purposes
this would be much easier. If others disagree then they can mention their
concerns on bug #276676.
Thanks and best regards,
Florian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Mickael Istria
Gesendet: 18 May 2009 11:29
An: Java Workflow Toolbox
Betreff: Re: AW: [jwt-dev] New JWT integration build
Hi Florian,
Except in case we use the same letter for all build type, there will always
be this behavior (it seems that version are compared lexicograpphically, so
that S... > I...).
If you think it is useful, I can replace the pattern version, which is
currently ${buildType}${buildTime} to be ${buildTime}-${buildType}, so that
the latest build will be prefered. Simply open a bug against releng and I'll
change it ASAP.
For the error telling that the site does not exist, I cannot do
anything: This is probably an error that occured on download server... I did
never experienced this.
Regards,
Mickael
Florian Lautenbacher a écrit :
> Hi Mickael, all,
>
> is there actually a possibility to test stable and integration build
> features? Each time I have a stable build installed and want to update
> to a new integration build it says that this is not successfull since
> a newer version is already installed. This is probably due to the
> usage of "I" and "S" in the names of our builds. Therefore, every time
> I need to uninstall JWT Stable build and then can re-install JWT using
> the integration update site. Maybe you have an idea how this can be
> improved? The other way it normally works fine (from integration to a
newer stable build).
>
> BTW: the first time I contacted the integration update site the server
> answered that there is no site available. When I tried it a second
> time, it worked fine. Strange behavior...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Florian
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Im Auftrag von Mickael Istria
> Gesendet: 14 May 2009 15:08
> An: Java Workflow Toolbox
> Betreff: [jwt-dev] New JWT integration build
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since we are in a process of stabilization, and that we have fixed
> several bugs, I kicked a new integration build, You can try it like
> always on JWT integration update site [1].
> By the way, feel free to ask for a new build any time you think it is
> necessary! Once started, it only requires 6 min to be available on
> update-site, then don't be shy to ask for more builds.
>
> Regards,
> Mickael
>
> [1] http://download.eclipse.org/technology/jwt/integration-update-site
> _______________________________________________
> jwt-dev mailing list
> jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jwt-dev mailing list
> jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
