Re: [jetty-users] Customizing 404 response for virtual hosts

[Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wait, you are managing the setHandler's yourself?

You are not using the deploy module in the distribution?

Almost sounds like you are using embedded-jetty techniques.

Is this the case?

Joakim Erdfelt / joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:25 AM, John English <john.foreign@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 05/08/2015 20:28, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:

Dont set virtualHosts at all, no entries.
Don't use <Set name="virtualHosts"> at all.

That will accept answers from all hosts.

It would appear from my experiments that when there are multiple "setHandler" blocks defining webapps all mapped to "/", the last one wins if the virtual host lists are not disjoint. If I have one accepting 127.0.0.1 (A) and another without a VH list (B), specifying A then B means that B always responds. If I reverse the order (B then A), A accepts 127.0.0.1 correctly, but generates a default 404 page for 127.0.0.2 rather than invoking B.

--
John English
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users