Re: [jetty-users] Jetty 9.2.3 java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException

[Simone Bordet <sbordet@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Rajiv Bandaru <rajivbandaru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you very much Simone. Here is an update…
>
> Bumping up idle timeout from 200 to 3000 seem to work. I don’t get any
> timeouts when I set idle timeout at 3000ms. However, 3000ms is a long time
> for us.
>
> What do you recommend I tweak or change for us to work with 200ms idle
> timeout?

I cannot think of any benefit of having such a short idle timeout, and
I can think of many problems that it would generate.
Why do you want such a short idle timeout ?

-- 
Simone Bordet
----
http://cometd.org
http://webtide.com
http://intalio.com
Developer advice, training, services and support
from the Jetty & CometD experts.
Intalio, the modern way to build business applications.