Re: [jetty-users] Jetty SPDY use split package?

[Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, that's correct.

That's what the websocket-core renamed packages are now. (org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.*)

So we can prevent the package space overlap concerns in OSGi.

--

Joakim Erdfelt <joakim@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The packages for websocket are now a bit verbose.  Server and client
are ok, but core produces:

org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.annotations
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.api
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.api.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.driver
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.extensions
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.extensions.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.io
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.core.io.*


Can't this just be:


org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.annotations
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.api.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.driver
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.extensions.*
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io
org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.io.*


So long as no other module/jar contains any of these packages we are good.







--
Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.webtide.com
Developer advice and support from the Jetty & CometD experts.

_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users