[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jetty-users] Vert.x-like functionality in Jetty?

Hi,

Are you saying CometD provides the same scalability and concurrency Vert.x claims to provide?
If CometD provides (and has been providing for years) the high scalability and concurrency support, what's all Vert.x all about?  Is it the case that while CometD may provide the same stuff Vert.x does, CometD is not widely known or is at least not as popular? (if so, that can be critical for its future)

Thanks,
Otis 
----
Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase - http://sematext.com/spm 


From: Simone Bordet <sbordet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@xxxxxxxxx>; JETTY user mailing list <jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: [jetty-users] Vert.x-like functionality in Jetty?

Hi,

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
<otis_gospodnetic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there anything in Jetty (any version) that is Vert.x (see http://vertx.io/ ) like?
> I'm mainly referring to scalability and concurrency, as well as that distributed event bus.

You should have a look at CometD, http://cometd.org.

CometD is a web messaging platform, it scales well (see
http://webtide.intalio.com/2011/09/cometd-2-4-0-websocket-benchmarks/),
it's mature (years of experience) and has been successfully deployed
on small and large systems for years now, relying on standard
technologies such as Servlets and WebSocket.

What is it that appealed you in Vert.x, apart the (frankly
irrealistic) benchmark it was published some time ago, that you would
like to see in Jetty/CometD ?

Simon
--
http://cometd.org
http://intalio.com
http://bordet.blogspot.com
----
Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are,
to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability,
the implementation technique must be flawless.   Victoria Livschitz