Re: [jetty-users] Following license agreement while changing 'org.eclips

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

that should be fine, if its generally useful you could help sort out
what is needed to make this a more official package but that should be
fine

only think I question is the naming of the project unless your part of
the equinox project, you might want to name it something in your own
package space

but license wise your fine imo

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx



On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 16:54, Dmitry Ogievich <ogievichdv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a question regarding the license rules in following situation:
>
>
>
> Due to the project needs I need to change the classes from
> ‘org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty’ package. To overcame this I plan to
> download ‘org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty.source’ lib and copy classes
> located there to Plugin project with name ‘org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty’.
> After applying necessary changes I am planning to create jar from that
> project with the name
> ‘org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty_2.0.100.v20111215.jar’.
>
>
>
> Does the above approach is legitimate and license rules will be followed?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Dmitry Ogievich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>