[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jetty-users] Jetty really not Java EE compatible?
|
Specially if you base your project upon Spring, which is "de facto"
standard nowadays for enterprise/corporate Java, JEE full stack
container certification doesn't matters anymore.
I run my company critical business using Spring+Jetty combo and I'm
very happy about it. Very stable, fast, secure, etc, etc...
Rgrds,
JV -- julioviegas.com
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 09:49, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> jetty is not a java ee server in the same way that tomcat is not a
> java ee server and geronimo _is_
>
> jetty is a java web server and servlet engine, one part of the java ee
> stack that implements the servlet-api
>
> we don't care (from an implementation perspective) about all the rest
> of the goop in java ee
>
> geronimo and jboss are both java EE servers and jetty and be used as
> the servlet container in both of them
>
> if all you have is a war file, then a servlet container is enough, if
> you need a ear file to deploy ejb's all that sort of java ee stuff
> then you need something that deploys ear files.
>
> cheers,
> jesse
>
>
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 07:42, Ben Stover <bxstover@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When I go the following web page then there is said that Jetty is NOT java EE compatible.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_application_servers
>>
>> Is this true?
>>
>> What kind of compatibility is missing in detail?
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-users mailing list
>> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>
