[jetty-dev] minimal supported JVM class format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jetty-dev] minimal supported JVM class format

From: René Jansen <rvjansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:33:15 +0100
Delivered-to: jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jetty-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jetty-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev>, <mailto:jetty-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jetty-dev>, <mailto:jetty-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I have subscribed to this list because I have plans for netrexx.org and maybe rexxla.org that involve Jetty. I am running with version 9 RC0; RC1 did not bring me a lot of luck yet. This remark is mostly aimed at RC2; I see that the TimerScheduler bug has been corrected.

RC1 on IBM J9 1.6.0 gives me an UnsupportedClassVersionError: JVMCFRE003. I can built it myself but my question regards the minimals supported JVM version: what is it?

best regards,

René Vincent Jansen
Amsterdam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jetty-dev] minimal supported JVM class format
  - From: Thomas Becker

Prev by Date: [jetty-dev] Jetty 9.0.0.RC2 is staged
Next by Date: Re: [jetty-dev] minimal supported JVM class format
Previous by thread: [jetty-dev] Jetty 9.0.0.RC2 is staged
Next by thread: Re: [jetty-dev] minimal supported JVM class format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs