Re: [jetty-dev] Jetty-9 development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jetty-dev] Jetty-9 development

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:16:06 +1100
Delivered-to: jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jetty-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jetty-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev>, <mailto:jetty-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jetty-dev>, <mailto:jetty-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

.... and also because SPDY and websocket MUX both have flow control, it is no longer OK to have the blocking in the EndPoint, as that would block multiple Channels. The blocking has to be in the Channel itself.

References:
- [jetty-dev] Jetty-9 development
  - From: Greg Wilkins
- Re: [jetty-dev] Jetty-9 development
  - From: Greg Wilkins

Prev by Date: Re: [jetty-dev] Jetty-9 development
Next by Date: [jetty-dev] Jetty Version having fix for Denial of Service (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781677)
Previous by thread: Re: [jetty-dev] Jetty-9 development
Next by thread: [jetty-dev] Jetty Version having fix for Denial of Service (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781677)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs