Re: [jetty-dev] CQs for jetty8

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

what?  all I remember hearing was the xsd wasn't in the right place,
and that we were allowed to get it and put it in the right place for
the orbit dependency.  Aside from that its my understanding it all
worked fine.

cheers,
jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx



On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 22:19, Hugues Malphettes
<hmalphettes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is not just osgi goop: it is broken glassfish jars and we don't
> even for sure if they work with jetty-8 outside of osgi: last time I
> look at them they were lacking xsd files and dependencies that showed
> that they could not possibly work with jetty.
>
> If we were to forget about OSGi for a first phase: can you do the rest?
>
> Hugues
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Jesse McConnell
> <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I am inclined to think it ought to go into orbit
>>
>> if it breaks someone they should adjust themselves to be just 2.5
>> since 3.0 has been out for a while now..
>>
>> but that is my friday night not sure I give a damn opinion, I'll mull
>> it over a bit and reconsider :)
>>
>> at the least, could you make the proper osgi goop and get them into
>> the orbit-dependencies directory in the download under jetty dir?
>>
>> thanks!
>> jesse
>>
>> --
>> jesse mcconnell
>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 18:55, Hugues Malphettes
>> <hmalphettes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Jesse,
>>> I would commit those in jetty's svn or somewhere on jetty's downloads.
>>> I am not sure that these jars will work in OSGi: when we put these in
>>> Orbit, all the projects that are using
>>> Import-Package: javax.servlet;version="2.5"
>>> will start picking up servlet 3.0
>>>
>>> Servlet-3.0 will be fine.
>>> But the same will then happen for the jasper consumers: this is where
>>> we cannot put this in orbit without all required work to make sure
>>> that it works in OSGi.
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think,
>>> Hugues
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Jesse McConnell
>>> <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Greg, Hugues...(and Jan!)
>>>>
>>>> These CQ's are clear now (4710,4711, 4712) so once they are in orbit,
>>>> we can finally push jetty8 RC's
>>>>
>>>> I will get the release review documents submitted once we have the new
>>>> IPLog generated and we should be good to go.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> jesse
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> jesse mcconnell
>>>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jetty-dev mailing list
>>>> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>
>