Re: [jetty-dev] 7.2.2 and some other questions

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 15:47, Chad La Joie <lajoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just so I'm clear, you mean you wouldn't do an aggregate source bundle but
> would still have the source artifacts (so that things like Eclipse can still
> display the source when you open types/implementations)?

http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/jetty/jetty-distribution/7.2.1.v20101111/jetty-distribution-7.2.1.v20101111-src.zip

That is the specific artifact I am talking about doing away with....I
added it back into the build a release to three ago and I question
that now.  The per artifact source artifacts and javadoc artifacts are
required and not about to be done away with.

the specific javadoc bit I am talking about getting rid of is the one
under the javadoc directory of the distribution pulled from that same
location above....its a pain to generate for that distribution and I
question its value anymore since the proxy approach pointing to
eclipse.org seemed to be working fine for folks.

cheers!
jesse

> On 12/2/10 4:05 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>
>> how are folks feeling about pulling a 7.2.2 release soon?
>>
>> Also, a while back I added in a source distribution and a generated
>> version of the javadocs that could go into the binary distribution...A
>> side effect of this is the release process takes astronomically longer
>> to run because of some issues in the javadoc plugin.  Do you all see
>> value in keeping this in the distribution or could we go back to the
>> previous approach of proxying to the published documentation?
>>
>> Lastly, I am thinking about not bothering with .bz2 formats in our
>> binary distributions...would it break anyones hearts to do away with
>> it?  I get a little fearful of shoving TOO much stuff into maven
>> central and that and dropping the source distro (who uses those
>> anymore).  I am thinking this would be fine because I am not aware of
>> anyone asking us for source distro's or the javadoc in the distro
>> while it was missing.  Source wise we have great tooling that puts the
>> source with the artifact, the javadoc with the artifact and anyone
>> that needs to build jetty can just pull from SVN like the rest of the
>> known universe since a source bundle at the distribution lvl is
>> effectly just an svn export anyway.
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> jesse
>>
>>
>> --
>> jesse mcconnell
>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-dev mailing list
>> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>>
>
> --
> Chad La Joie
> http://itumi.biz
> trusted identities, delivered
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-dev mailing list
> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>