[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jdt-dev] Resolving unresolved IMethod signatures?
|
Hi Marc,
To me this sounds exactly like this current request:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=502563
Jay's current proposal in that bug looks similar to what
you already have in SignatureResolver.resolveType()
- and Jay already remarked that the approach is inherently
uncertain :(
Perhaps you want to join the discussion in that bug?
Maybe your example will also help to improve the understanding
of what might be needed?
Given your implementation, the problem you are seeing _could_
also be a bug in JDT.
best,
Stephan
On 03/08/2017 10:54 AM, Marc Hoffmann wrote:
Dear JDT experts,
for the EclEmma project (which recently became a eclipse.org project) we have the requirement to resolve IMethod signatures to map
unresolved IMethod objects from Java source to the corresponding binary signature retrieved from the code coverage runtime.
Currently we have our own implementation which is quite complex and probably has some bug (e.g. https://bugs.eclipse.org/513294).
Question: Is there a existing API or best practice to resolve unresolved IMethod signatures?
Thanks for your time,
-marc
_______________________________________________
jdt-dev mailing list
jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-dev
