Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jdt-core-dev] Java9 Support

Hi Tom,

I just released the change removing that restriction. In the next feature patch, you should see the changes.

Regards,
Jay

Inactive hide details for Tom Schindl ---06/30/2016 03:47:16 PM---Hi, I understand that (I even found the position in the code)Tom Schindl ---06/30/2016 03:47:16 PM---Hi, I understand that (I even found the position in the code). Would you

From: Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 06/30/2016 03:47 PM
Subject: Re: [jdt-core-dev] Java9 Support
Sent by: jdt-core-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





Hi,

I understand that (I even found the position in the code). Would you
mind adding JavaFX-Modules by default?

I'd really like to start adopting Java9 (or at least I want to see that
everything builds on Java9).

Our plan is to release a Java9 compatible version of our library
(although Java8 will stay the default supported version). The important
thing is that we maybe need to feedback information to Oracle based on
our findings (of things that don't work).

Tom

On 30.06.16 06:06, Jayaprakash Arthanareeswaran wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Yes, indeed we are filtering only the java.* modules in, although this
> is only a temporarily thing (for performance reasons). It is still
> undecided on how we want to allow the user to be able to select the
> modules to be loaded (if at all). Stay tuned.
>
> Regards,
> Jay
>
> Inactive hide details for Tom Schindl ---06/25/2016 05:50:44 AM---Hi, I
> wanted to give that a spin for my JavaFX work but unforTom Schindl
> ---06/25/2016 05:50:44 AM---Hi, I wanted to give that a spin for my
> JavaFX work but unfortunately the
>
> From: Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 06/25/2016 05:50 AM
> Subject: [jdt-core-dev] Java9 Support
> Sent by: jdt-core-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give that a spin for my JavaFX work but unfortunately the
> javafx-modules (although they are in my JDK) are not resolved.
>
> Where does JDT get the list of modules it show for an installed JRE?
>
> Running -listmods provides this:
>
> -----8<-----
>> Thomass-MacBook-Pro-Retina:Eclipse tomschindl$
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-9.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java -listmods
>> java.activation@9-ea
>> java.annotations.common@9-ea
>> java.base@9-ea
>> java.compact1@9-ea
>> java.compact2@9-ea
>> java.compact3@9-ea
>> java.compiler@9-ea
>> java.corba@9-ea
>> java.datatransfer@9-ea
>> java.desktop@9-ea
>> java.httpclient@9-ea
>> java.instrument@9-ea
>> java.jnlp@9-ea
>> java.logging@9-ea
>> java.management@9-ea
>> java.naming@9-ea
>> java.prefs@9-ea
>> java.rmi@9-ea
>> java.scripting@9-ea
>> java.se@9-ea
>> java.se.ee@9-ea
>> java.security.jgss@9-ea
>> java.security.sasl@9-ea
>> java.smartcardio@9-ea
>> java.sql@9-ea
>> java.sql.rowset@9-ea
>> java.transaction@9-ea
>> java.xml@9-ea
>> java.xml.bind@9-ea
>> java.xml.crypto@9-ea
>> java.xml.ws@9-ea
>> javafx.base@9-ea
>> javafx.controls@9-ea
>> javafx.deploy@9-ea
>> javafx.fxml@9-ea
>> javafx.graphics@9-ea
>> javafx.media@9-ea
>> javafx.swing@9-ea
>> javafx.web@9-ea
>> jdk.accessibility@9-ea
>> jdk.attach@9-ea
>> jdk.charsets@9-ea
>> jdk.compiler@9-ea
>> jdk.crypto.ec@9-ea
>> jdk.crypto.pkcs11@9-ea
>> jdk.deploy@9-ea
>> jdk.deploy.controlpanel@9-ea
>> jdk.deploy.controlpanel.fx@9-ea
>> jdk.dynalink@9-ea
>> jdk.hotspot.agent@9-ea
>> jdk.httpserver@9-ea
>> jdk.internal.le@9-ea
>> jdk.internal.opt@9-ea
>> jdk.jartool@9-ea
>> jdk.javadoc@9-ea
>> jdk.javaws@9-ea
>> jdk.jcmd@9-ea
>> jdk.jconsole@9-ea
>> jdk.jdeps@9-ea
>> jdk.jdi@9-ea
>> jdk.jdwp.agent@9-ea
>> jdk.jfr@9-ea
>> jdk.jlink@9-ea
>> jdk.jshell@9-ea
>> jdk.jsobject@9-ea
>> jdk.jstatd@9-ea
>> jdk.jvmstat@9-ea
>> jdk.localedata@9-ea
>> jdk.management@9-ea
>> jdk.naming.dns@9-ea
>> jdk.naming.rmi@9-ea
>> jdk.net@9-ea
>> jdk.pack200@9-ea
>> jdk.packager@9-ea
>> jdk.packager.services@9-ea
>> jdk.plugin@9-ea
>> jdk.plugin.dom@9-ea
>> jdk.plugin.server@9-ea
>> jdk.policytool@9-ea
>> jdk.rmic@9-ea
>> jdk.scripting.nashorn@9-ea
>> jdk.scripting.nashorn.shell@9-ea
>> jdk.sctp@9-ea
>> jdk.security.auth@9-ea
>> jdk.security.jgss@9-ea
>> jdk.snmp@9-ea
>> jdk.unsupported@9-ea
>> jdk.vm.ci@9-ea
>> jdk.xml.bind@9-ea
>> jdk.xml.dom@9-ea
>> jdk.xml.ws@9-ea
>> jdk.zipfs@9-ea
> -----8<-----
>
> The JRE-Container in my IDE shows only the entries beginning with java.
>
> Is it possible that you are filtering the list somehow?
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Thomas Schindl, CTO
> BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
> Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck
>
http://www.bestsolution.at/
> Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
> [attachment "jdt-jre.png" deleted by Jayaprakash
> Arthanareeswaran/India/IBM] _______________________________________________
> jdt-core-dev mailing list
> jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdt-core-dev mailing list
> jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
>


--
Thomas Schindl, CTO
BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck
http://www.bestsolution.at/
Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
_______________________________________________
jdt-core-dev mailing list
jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev




Back to the top