Re: [jdt-core-dev] Lambda-Compilation fails on b105

[Rabea Gransberger <rgransberger@xxxxxx>]

Hi Srinkath,

here's the (most likely matching) changeset from the lambda repo with 
the LambdaMetaFactory signature change:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/langtools/rev/718064a04b56

And the bug tracking this change can be found here
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8016281

According discussion was in the lambda-dev mailinglist in June/July.
See
http://openjdk.5641.n7.nabble.com/RFR-8016281-The-SAM-method-should-be-passed-to-the-metafactory-as-a-MethodType-not-a-MethodHandle-tt142872.html
for reference.

Please also note that as of last thursday b106 is the official developer 
preview build and might be best to use for testing.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <mark.reinhold@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 9 September 2013 18:46
Subject: JDK 8 Developer Preview
To: jdk8-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Build 106, promoted last Thursday, is the Developer Preview build.
This milestone is intended for broad testing by developers [1].

For reference, the proprietary Oracle builds for this milestone can
be found here: http://jdk8.java.net/download.html .

Pointers to other builds are welcome!

- Mark


[1] http://mreinhold.org/blog/jdk8-preview

Am 09.09.2013 21:50, schrieb Tom Schindl:
> Hi,
>
> Did you find out something? Is there a bug to track?
>
> Tom
>
> On 06.09.13 04:27, Srikanth S Adayapalam wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Thanks for trying out the BETA. We are still at 8b100 and this test
> > passes there.
> > I haven't seen any discussion on the EG about the proposed signature
> > change,
> > I'll investigate.
> >
> > BTW, certain crucial parts such as changes to overload resolution and
> > type inference
> > are still in the works, so even simple programs that require such
> > support may not
> > work - We are far more advanced in our support for JSR308 (nearly
> > complete) and
> > JEP 118 (complete) than on JSR 335. We expect to address these gaps soon
> > in the
> > coming weeks.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Srikanth
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdt-core-dev mailing list
> > jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdt-core-dev mailing list
> jdt-core-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-core-dev