[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jdt-apt-dev] path bug?
|
Hi,
Thaks for grat job!
everithing seems be ok.
have a nice day & again thanks
J.Burian
Jess Garms wrote:
Ah yes, now I understand. We (BEA) ran into the same problem with the
Filer API: no way to perform a final, project-wide build step. For our
particular case, we ended up having a separate, non-apt based eclipse
extension that performs the final packaging step. It's triggered by a
deployment from WTP (another eclipse project), but isn't part of the APT
plugin at all.
Because the Filer interface is defined by Sun, we can't change it
directly. JSR 269 (http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=269) is deciding
on new public APIs to replace the ones in com.sun.mirror. Hopefully it
can provide a reasonable solution.
On a different note, I just checked in a fix for the issue you were
seeing: we now provide absolute paths for all the file-based options
that the environment provides.
Thanks,
Jess
-----Original Message-----
From: jdt-apt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jdt-apt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Juraj Burian
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:12 AM
To: Eclipse JDT Apt developers list.
Subject: Re: [jdt-apt-dev] path bug?
Thank you Jess,
I can help fix this problem if you are interested ....
About my p.s. : Filler api has methods oriented only on the process of
creation of the files,
but we need to merge files and so on ..., so we can't do everything
what we need to.
Typical use case is generation of the (ejb) deployment descriptors,
because apt works with "compilation increments" => that we must merge
generated files,
especially if one generated file is a result of parsing of the many
source files ...
Best regards,
J.B.
p.s. sorry for my ugly English ...
Jess Garms wrote:
Yes, that definitely sounds like a bug in our implementation. I've
filed
the following bug in bugzilla to track it:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=108137
WRT your post-script, I've afraid I don't understand the issue. You
said, "We can't handle all of the existing states with a Filler API".
Thanks,
Jess
-----Original Message-----
From: jdt-apt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jdt-apt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Juraj Burian
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 7:02 AM
To: jdt-apt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jdt-apt-dev] path bug?
Hello ladies and gentlemen,
thanks for great job.
I have one little problem:
only a project relative part of the path is returned by -s option.
The original implementation gives a full path.
Is there a possibility to fix this "bug" ?
I think that it is a bug, because there doesn't exist the possibility
to retrieve the missing part of the path.
Please let me know your opinion.
best regards
J.Burian
p.s. we can't handle all of the existing states with a Filler API.
_______________________________________________
jdt-apt-dev mailing list
jdt-apt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-apt-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-apt-dev mailing list
jdt-apt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-apt-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-apt-dev mailing list
jdt-apt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-apt-dev
_______________________________________________
jdt-apt-dev mailing list
jdt-apt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jdt-apt-dev