Re: [incquery-dev] psystem suggestions for improvement

[Ujhelyi Zoltán <ujhelyiz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> @all (Zoli, Akos): would improving the Psystem in this regard be feasible within the timeframe of the LS project?

I was planning to do that as well inside the LS timeframe (and then of course it would be easy to do for Rete networks as well), but that will not happen shortly. On the other hand, it would entirely not be funny, if that would be done independently for the Rete case, as in our case the PSystem already took some major changes, so merging would be a huge pain then... Sorry to say that.

Cheers,
Zoli
-- Zoltán Ujhelyi
https://www.inf.mit.bme.hu/en/members/ujhelyiz

Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group
Budapest University of Technology and Economics

On 2013.04.16., at 21:38, Istvan Rath <rath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi  
> 
> While working on improving the Rete visualizer, I again noticed that the PSystem <-> Pattern model "traceability" (aka Stubs) is dodgy at best. My immediate goal is to display which pattern definition a "RetePatternMatcher" node belongs to (IMHO this would be the single most important improvement to make this feature more accessible), and this does not seem straightforward with the current API.
> 
> @Gaben: can this be done quickly somehow?
> 
> @all (Zoli, Akos): would improving the Psystem in this regard be feasible within the timeframe of the LS project?
> 
> cheers
> Istvan
> 
> --
> Istvan RATH, PhD
> Research fellow
> Budapest University of Technology and Economics
> Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> incquery-dev mailing list
> incquery-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incquery-dev