Re: [imp-dev] Vote for Committer status for Paul Klint was started by Ju

["Robert M. Fuhrer" <rfuhrer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Based on Paul's long history with the Meta-environment, and the high
quality of the engineering there, I'm sure his contributions to Rascal
and IMP will be great additions of high quality, and will help bring IMP
support to bear on another vital aspect of language meta-tooling and
frameworks.

In short, a hearty +1!

On Mar 30, 2011, at 3:32 PM, portal on behalf of Jurgen Vinju wrote:

> technology.imp Committers,
> This automatically generated message signals that Jurgen Vinju has
> nominated Paul Klint as a Committer on the technology.imp project. The
> reason given is as follows:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've started a contribution questionnaire for adding most of the Rascal
> language, it's IDE and it's IDE meta tooling for other languages (all IMP
> based naturally) to IMP. For this I need the main contributors of Rascal to
> be committers on IMP. For now please consider Paul Klint as well as Tijs
> van der Storm for committer rights on IMP. There may be a need to ask for
> more committers rights, but I'd like to start with these.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jurgen
> 
> 
> The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
> portal for the votes to be properly recorded.  The voting will continue
> until either all 3 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
> given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
> one week). Because there are three or fewer existing Committers, they must
> all vote and vote +1 for a successful election.
> 
> Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
> portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
> correctly recorded unless you use the portal):
> 
>    http://portal.eclipse.org/
> 
> The project Committers eligible to vote are:
> 
>    Robert Fuhrer
>    Stanley Sutton
>    Jurgen Vinju
> 
> *NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
> allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be
> expired, regardless of its current status.  Should papework processing on
> the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
> have to be held.
> 
> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
> lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> imp-dev mailing list
> imp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
> 

Cheers,
 - Bob